{"id":17262,"date":"2025-12-09T10:11:45","date_gmt":"2025-12-09T10:11:45","guid":{"rendered":"\/cybersecurity-blog\/?p=17262"},"modified":"2025-12-09T10:20:17","modified_gmt":"2025-12-09T10:20:17","slug":"industry-geo-threat-landscape","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/any.run\/cybersecurity-blog\/industry-geo-threat-landscape\/","title":{"rendered":"Track\u00a0Evolving Cyber Threat\u00a0Landscape\u00a0for Your\u00a0Industry & Country\u00a0in Real Time\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Effective cyber security depends on knowing which risks matter most. ANY.RUN\u2019s Threat Intelligence Lookup<\/a> provides industry and geographic context, powered by live attack investigations from 15,000+ companies<\/a>, that SOC teams need to prioritize alerts, IOCs<\/a>, and threats with confidence and build their defense strategy for maximum ROI. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here’s how. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenge: Context-free TI Wastes SOC Time <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Most threat intelligence<\/a> sources return long lists of IPs, domains, and hashes, but they rarely explain how those indicators map to a specific sector or region. SOC teams end up treating every threat as equally important, spreading detection and hunting efforts thin and burning time on noise instead of the threats that actually appear in their environment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

For MSSPs<\/a>, the problem is even sharper: they serve\u00a0clients\u00a0from many fields\u00a0at once.\u00a0The lack of\u00a0industry or geo context\u00a0makes it hard to prioritize work and hard to prove value to clients who expect sector-aware monitoring.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Solution: Industry & Geo Threat Landscape for Every Indicator <\/h2>\n\n\n
\n
\"\"
Industry & geo threat landscape data for the Tycoon2FA phishkit<\/em> <\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

TI Lookup\u00a0now\u00a0adds\u00a0an extra layer of context on top of every\u00a0Premium\u00a0search\u00a0query. In\u00a0addition\u00a0to\u00a0listing\u00a0IOCs, IOAs, IOBs<\/a>, and sandbox sessions, it builds a real-time snapshot of which industries and countries are\u00a0most commonly associated\u00a0with the threat or indicators you queried.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The functionality provides three key context fields: 
 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n
\n Field <\/th>\n \n Description <\/th>\n \n Benefit <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n
\n Risk score by industry\u00a0 <\/td>\n \n Likelihood (%) that the queried threat\/indicator is linked to attacks on each industry based on the search results. <\/td>\n \n See\u00a0how\u00a0likely your\u00a0industry\u00a0toface similar threats to prioritize defenses.\u00a0 <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n Threat names\u00a0 <\/td>\n \n How often (%) each threat appears in the current search\u00a0results.\u00a0 <\/td>\n \n Discover the\u00a0most likely threats\u00a0related to your query for focused investigation and response.\u00a0 <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n Submission countries\u00a0 <\/td>\n \n How\u00a0often\u00a0the queried threat\/indicator\u00a0appears\u00a0in submissions from each country based on the search\u00a0results. <\/td>\n \n \u00a0See where relevant threats are\u00a0reported\u00a0the most to uncover geographic hotspots and trends.\u00a0 <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n<\/div>